Entering The Saloon

Entering The Saloon

Film
Back To The Future 3
Tags
setting
Description
In "Back to the Future Part III" (1990), Marty enters a saloon, where the Old West setting starkly contrasts his modern demeanor.
How does the saloon in "Back to the Future Part III" remind you of old cowboy movies?
Based on typical cowboy films, what did you expect to happen to Marty inside that saloon?

Discussion

In the film "Back to the Future Part III" (1990), directed by Robert Zemeckis, the scene where Marty McFly steps into the saloon serves as a pivotal intersection of time periods. The saloon, meticulously detailed, captures the essence of the Wild West, echoing the conventions of classic cowboy films — from the ambiance created by the background music to the characteristic creaky wooden floors.

However, Marty's presence introduces a stark contrast. Dressed in his 1980s attire, he becomes a conspicuous anomaly in this historical setting. This deliberate juxtaposition, crafted by Zemeckis and screenwriter Bob Gale, showcases a blending of genres: the traditional Western and the contemporary time-travel narrative.

For audiences familiar with Western genre conventions, this scene offers a dual experience. It presents the familiarity of a well-known setting, but Marty's modern intrusion challenges conventional expectations, prompting viewers to anticipate unconventional developments. The interplay of the old and the new serves to engage and intrigue, demonstrating the film's innovative approach to storytelling.

Analysis Questions

  1. How does the design and atmosphere of the saloon in "Back to the Future Part III" reflect the typical settings of classic Western films?
  2. Considering Marty's modern attire juxtaposed against the saloon's traditional backdrop, how might this contrast shape an audience's expectations for the challenges he might encounter in the scene?
  3. How does Zemeckis utilize the saloon setting, combined with Marty's anachronistic appearance, to challenge or subvert traditional Western film conventions, and what impact might this have on an informed viewer's interpretation of the scene's deeper narrative significance?