This page provides an analysis of the film Inside Llewyn Davis, exploring themes of artistic struggle and the cyclical nature of life, which can inform media education by prompting discussions on narrative structure, character development, and the cultural context of storytelling in film.
The twenty best films of the decade were determined by polling all the major and continuing contributors to Reverse Shot in the publication's history.
And It Wonât Be Long Eric Hynes on Inside Llewyn Davis
âYou probably heard that one before. It was never new and it never gets old. Itâs a folk song.â
These are the first non-sung lines in Inside Llewyn Davis, and as with most lines in a Coen Brothers movie, they are freighted with meaning, vibrating into and destabilizing what came before and comes after. Loosely inspired by an actual artist, named after a fictional album, made by two artists occupationally interested in honoring and redefining forms and genres, Inside Llewyn Davis is a movie that follows characters who make and perform folk songs, and which itself effectively becomes a feature-length folk song. Folk is a genre and ethos in which tunes are revisited and repurposed, stories are recalled and recast, chords are rehearsed and rearranged, where the past is recruited to define or erase or comment upon or malign or armor the present. Watching the film just six years after its late 2013 release already feels like putting on a favorite record that time has sharpened and warped, as time and folk records are designed to do. It was never new and it never gets old.
True to form, after ambling uptown and downtown, to Chicago and back to New York, the film will return us to those opening words in its final scene, though when we get there itâs not at first clear if itâs metaphorically or literally a moment weâve experienced before. Life begets art forms, which beget life; emotion begets performances, which beget emotion; behavior begets character, which begets behavior; life begets death, which begets lifeâitâs all looping, regenerative. Itinerant Llewyn Davis (Oscar Isaac) moves along somewhere, settles down somewhere else, wakes up with himself, and moves along again. His days may be a Sisyphean struggle, repetitive rather than progressive, but the cycles do build upon and recall the last, and give meaning to the next. You probably heard that one before.
âGâŠGâŠCâŠGâŠGâŠEâŠ,â John Goodmanâs smack-addict A-hole jazzbo Roland Turner bellows while Llewyn drives him to Chicago during the filmâs nearly self-contained road trip episode, mocking the stunted sameness of folk chord progression. Turner fails, of course, to factor in the crucial variances that occur beyond and between the chordsâLlewyn knows this, but the blow still lands. Moments later Llewyn reveals that he lost his former partner, Mike, to suicide. Why does he open up to Turner, of all people? Itâs like making a confession to a demon, jumping a cannonball into concrete. âWell shit, I donât blame him. I couldnât take it either having to play âJimmy Crack Cornâ every night.â His partner Mike got off the carousel. Llewyn is still on it. And the music he hears, and plays, whenever Mike comes to mind, is damn-near Turnerâs mocking âGâŠGâŠCâŠGâŠGâŠEâŠâ
We first hear the chords of âFare Thee Well (Dinkâs Song)â as a spirited duet recording by Llewyn and Mikeâperformed by Isaac and Marcus Mumfordâwhich Llewyn puts on while at the upper west side apartment of the kindly, well-off, benefactor-like Gorfeins, and which then continues over the musicianâs passage downtown via subway. The song is revived by Llewyn for the filmâs goosebump-provoking finale, with each L in âwellâ progressively sustained until breath has fully left his lungs. âLife ainât worth living without the one you loveâ is a kicker in the recorded duet version; itâs missing in the live reprise, perhaps because the sentiment is painfully apparent. Sounds repeat with variation, days repeat with variation, breaths repeat with different emphases, the movie repeats and different elements emerge.
Itâs a film made in 2013 thatâs set in 1961, featuring people in their twenties and thirties singing songs written generations before they were born, that takes place over a week that nevertheless feels, as Llewyn himself says at one point, like months. Itâs the dawn of the space age, and yet we open in a place anachronistically, absurdly called The Gaslight CafĂ©, the inside of which looks like a catacomb. Note the first words sung in the film, in the shadowy Greenwich Village cafe, before weâve met anyone or understood anything. âHang me, oh hang me. Iâll be dead and gone. Wouldnât mind the hanging, but the laying in the grave so long,â incanted while young people in turtlenecks nod their heads in assent. Their weariness is inherited from parents who might have fought in the war and lived through the Depression, ancestors who immigrated, worked, and hustled, their premature gravity perhaps felt, perhaps performed, perhaps just projected by the subjective emotional state of the man on stage, whose point of view weâre tacitly adopting for the entirety of the film. The songs get passed down, unearthed, reformed. We learn that Llewyn recorded the fishermanâs song âThe Shoals of Herringâ for his Merchant Marine father when he was a teenagerâyet itâs a song that didnât historically exist in this form until 1960, when it was credited to English singer-songwriter Ewan MacColl, who of course was basing it off of earlier variants on a similar title, theme, and melody. Many of the songs in the film had been recorded by Dave Van Ronk, like Llewyn a fixture of the Village folk scene, yet thereâs little affinity between their stories, little biographical resonance. Just the forms, the spaces, the songs. A voice arises from the catacomb, and itâs hard to tell if itâs among the living or the dead.
Llewyn is both older and younger than he seemed at first. Heâs labored at sea like his father and has a sister whoâs mother to a preteen son. He also lives so far outside practical considerations that he depends on the accommodations of wary friends and hesitant strangers to house him from night to night, still relying on their tolerance for romantic notions of the unsullied troubadour. The Coens set their story during the era of On the Road, but it has none of the heady energy of Kerouacâs novel, none of the recasting of America through the rebellious bluster of self-authoring men. Every scene is a wave that crashes against Llewyn, sending him back however many steps he had taken. Every dollar made is spent immediately to cover a debt. And each of those debts turns out to be inconsequential, illusory. Rent, cups of coffee, abortions, captainâs licenses, tanks of gas, royalties, a set at the Gaslightâmoney comes in and goes back out, changing nothing in the process.
We donât see Llewyn experiencing desire or satisfaction, he doesnât enjoy food or drugs or sex (though he does seem to be paying a price for previous indulgences), he never settles into a place of his own, doesnât even seem to experience sleep except as a disorienting interlude. And when he takes that drive to Chicago, accompanied, incredibly, by Garrett Hedlund, who played Kerouacâs buddy Neal Cassidy in the previous yearâs On the Road adaptation, itâs a greyscale journey through a drab, lifeless landscape, punctuated by actual insult and injury, culminating not in the apex of creativity but its actual nadir, the reduction of art to its monetary value. Auditioning for music executive Bud Grossman (F. Murray Abraham) in another cavernous, funereal theater, Llewyn doesnât blow it, in fact he nails a solo incantation of âThe Death of Queen Jane.â And yet, âI donât see a lot of money here,â is Grossmanâs reply. For my money, itâs the decadeâs most devastating line of dialogue, rationally true and yet condemnatory of a world defined by such rationality. Llewyn sinks into his chair, but there really wasnât much further to sink. âSo thatâs it?â he says, knowing it is, regardless of what they say to each other next. And still 30 minutes remain; several verses have yet to be sung. Itâs a folk song.
You know Llewyn wonât come out on top. You know heâs caught in a loop. Still you never stop hoping it will be different. That he will stop being his worst enemy; that he will cease pushing away people who want to help him. That some people, namely the Gorfeins, look past his distemper to keep accepting him into their homes exposes their own loop, which is a loop of forgiveness, of empathy. For not every loop is pathetic. And looping is still living. Loops and their variants are inherent to performance, to practice, where actions and skills are refined, where progress is defined between the lines. Do we really need to move forward to live fully? Does Llewyn need to either grow beyond the Gaslight and make a good living or give up? Does he need to start a family and move to the suburbs; does he need a backup plan? (The scenes where this theme is explored, via Carey Mulliganâs Jean, are the most strained in the film, largely because of how thinly her part is written and performed, but also, possibly, because, this being Llewynâs POV, of his limited patience for impediments of any kind, especially emotional ones.) Do his pursuits need to transcend hammering that âLâ in âFare Thee Well,â or throwing out resonant echoes in âThe Death of Queen Janeââor might that be enough?
The complication, which makes our protagonist so hard to shake, and perhaps so easy to feel unsettled or condemned by, is Llewynâs dissatisfaction and inchoate rage. Even if we accept the loop of life, even if we can appreciate his talents despite the lack of appreciation and missed opportunities and self-sabotageâhe canât, and wonât. Though what makes him harder to love is also what makes him more alive, more recognizably unstable. He strains against it all. He pushes against the cycle, even as he authors it. Heâs vicious to people who want to help him, heâs careless about people he actually seems to care about. He wants to at least mind a cat heâs stuck with but canât even be bothered to know its sex, let alone its name. (He later learns the Gorfeinsâ cat is named is Ulysses, long after weâve heard a receptionist mishear our wandering friend, stating, or perhaps foretelling, âLlewyn is the cat.â) He chases after it, but heâs always chasing after it, whatever it is. Moving defines him. Moving defines us too, until weâre still, finally.
In the last few shots of the film, Llewyn has stopped moving. Returning to a scene glimpsed at the beginning, heâs been punched out by the avenging southern husband to a warbling harpist heâd heckled the night before at the Gaslightâan explosion occasioned by jealousy and frustration over Jean, who seemingly affects him more than he lets her know. Heâs left huddled on the ground, leaning against a wall at the corner where the alleyway meets the sidewalk, overhearing muffled evidence of Bob Dylanâs interpretation of âFare Thee Wellâ from the Gaslight stage, looking over his shoulder while his assailant speeds away in a yellow cab. He scoffs through a bloody lip at the husband getting a cabâlikely at his assailantâs ability to afford a cab, though he might also envy the escape. Heâll be leaving soon as well, having agreed to board a union freighter (ââŠit ainât the leaving thatâs a-grieving meâ we can hear Dylan singing), but it wonât be the leaving of a comparatively wealthy southern man rejoining his wife and getting out of seedy New York, nor will it be the coming and going of Minnesotan Dylan reinventing himself on Llewynâs home turf, nor is it the leaving and journeying of Kerouac and Cassidy, a repossessing of the highways and byways that connect New York to Minnesota and to the South and California. Itâs the leaving of a defeated homegrown player having nowhere else to go, no bed to lie in in his own village; itâs the leaving of resignation, of knowing what you want and could be, but instead finding yourself huddling in the alleyway watching and listening to others having and being it.
Maybe our Ulysses gets on that boat, maybe he reverts to this loop, maybe he emerges from this grief and depression, maybe he just moves and drinks and copes; weâll never know. The moments pass us by, carrying with them success, fame, happiness, opportunity, sometimes while weâre looking and sometimes when weâre not. Either way weâre still there, or here, saddled with the loss and regret, considering where and how to move next, or if itâs time to stop. Our versions end while the songs we inhabit keep going; the story ends, cutting to black, while the song keeps playing over the credits. It was never new and it never gets old. Meanwhile we were, and we do. And Iâve a feeling the song of Inside Llewyn Davis will continue to sound distinct, likely only more devastating and more valuable for being so, at whatever point we encounter it.